On 23 Dec 2006 at 13:49, William T Goodall wrote: > > On 23 Dec 2006, at 12:33PM, Andrew Crystall wrote: > > > On 22 Dec 2006 at 20:46, Ronn! Blankenship wrote: > > > >> As is the case with so many reports of the results of polls, it would > >> be informative to see how the questions were worded. (Googling > >> "guardian religion poll" leads to the article, but I don't see a link > >> to a copy of the poll questions there . . . ) > > > > And apparently - I'm trying to find a verification I can use - this > > poll was mainly conducted in a poor inner-city area which has > > previously been affected by rioting. > > Which part of > > "ICM interviewed a random sample of 1,006 adults aged 18+ by telephone > between December 12 and 13. Interviews were conducted across the > country and the results have been weighted to the profile of all > adults. ICM is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by > its rules." > > leads you to think that?
The part of "ICM has been caught lying before when well paid to support an agenda and this seems like another case of that"? But never mind, you keep going on your crusade for your faith. AndrewC Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
