On 12/24/06, Andrew Crystall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The part of "ICM has been caught lying before when well paid to > support an agenda and this seems like another case of that"? > > But never mind, you keep going on your crusade for your faith.
Brilliant: you assert without evidence that the polls methodology is flawed and then when asked to substantiate this claim declare it is irrelevant because the company is corrupt, whilst again providing no evidence. Poor faith-based Will and his crazy ideas about empiricism. Martin _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
