One thing I do when lifting quotes from another source is to put in a square 
bracket, then a quote, and end with a quote and a close-square-bracket. That 
sets it off very nicely.

Economy of expression is good until people start getting confused.

Just my $0.02


http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/

"The revolution will not be televised. It will be digitized."





>From: Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[email protected]>
>To: Killer Bs Discussion <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: mail client?
>Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:32:35 -0500
>
>jon louis mann wrote:
> > not sure what you mean?  what is a mail client?  where
> > do you want me to use quotees?  it should be obvious
> > what was paraphrased for brevity.  it is simple enough
> > to add quotes if that would please you.
> >
> > i edit everything i post tp remove all the headers.  i
> > use cut and paste to leave out the >>>s and other junk
> > that clutter everything up. i wish everyone else would
> > do the same.
>
>You're being asked to leave in the >>>>s so everyone else can figure out
>what's being quoted.
>
>If you really don't want those, doing something like:
>
>Rob:
>[quote what Rob said]
>
>Me:
>[add what you have to say]
>
>It confuses the hell out of everyone else if you don't either leave in
>the >s or do that.  So please do one or the other or someone will lash
>out rather non-constructively in frustration one of these days.
>
>And no, no one else is going to eliminate the >>>s just because you
>don't like them; it's a convention that's been used for years and years,
>and most of us are used to it and find it useful and find the lack of
>them annoying, to say the least.
>
>       Julia
>
>_______________________________________________
>http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to