And no, no one else is going to eliminate the >>>s
just 
because you don't like them; it's a convention that's
been used for years and  years, and most of us are
used to it and find it useful and find the lack of
them annoying, to say the least.
--julia

If the >>>s aren't a standard, they are at least a
widely supported  
convention. I don't think I remember using a mail
client that didn't  
use them, and it must be five years since I used one
that didn't  
colour different levels of quotation differently.

If people don't quote clearly, quote so much text that
there's no new  
content on the screen when I load the email, or
top-post or otherwise  
show themselves unwilling to provide me with context,
I tend not to  
read their emails. I don't suppose most people
consider that too much  
of a loss ;)
Rich

it's okay to ignore my feeble attempts to achieve
coherence, rich, -) and julia already straightened me
out on the top post rule.   i have been making a real
effort to preserve the context.  this is a difficult
interface for me and it is very difficult for me to
follow sometimes so i try to excise the relevant
portions.  even when i engage in long e-mail exchanges
with just one person it can get confusing.  i wonder
why mail client program(?) don't offer alternatives to
more and more >>>>>s, like different font types, or colours.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to