On 9/14/07, Ronn! Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What do these hypothetical costs that you have shown no evidence for > >got to do with reducing emissions? > > They present reasons why the proposal (at least as it is described in > the article referenced) is unrealistic.
You could indeed present several reasons why the proposal is difficult and possibly unwise to implement. This would be a non sequitar, of course, but hey. Martin _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
