At 07:01 PM Friday 9/14/2007, Martin Lewis wrote: >On 9/14/07, Ronn! Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What do these hypothetical costs that you have shown no evidence for > > >got to do with reducing emissions? > > > > They present reasons why the proposal (at least as it is described in > > the article referenced) is unrealistic. > > You could indeed present several reasons why the proposal is >difficult and possibly unwise to implement. This would be a non >sequitar, of course, but hey. > > Martin
<http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/non%20sequitur>: non sequitur One entry found for non sequitur. Main Entry: non se·qui·tur Pronunciation: 'nän-'se-kw&-t&r also -"tur Function: noun Etymology: Latin, it does not follow 1 : an inference that does not follow from the premises; specifically : a fallacy resulting from a simple conversion of a universal affirmative proposition or from the transposition of a condition and its consequent 2 : a statement (as a response) that does not follow logically from or is not clearly related to anything previously said It seems to me that pointing out a significant problem with the implementation of a proposal which was not addressed in the proposal is indeed clearly related to the proposal. -- Ronn! :) _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
