On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The alternative might not seem any better, but for the money I'm
> pretty sure it couldn't be much worse, and I think its high time we
> try something else.

Your experimental system is highly inefficient. Don't you think it
would be much better to conduct a large series of trials on various
systems in parallel?
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to