>Well, we just elected an elitist as president, by a substantial majority.

Well, we elected an "elite" president, not he same thing as being eletiest -- 
unless being raised by a single mother and grandmother, earning a scholarship 
to college and working your way through Harvard make you an "elitist" but being 
born a millionaire and getting into ivy league schools on your father's 
influence (Bush) or being the son and grandson of Admirals and marrying a 
multi-millionaire (McCain) makes you just plain folks.  There is a different 
between being elite -- well educated, skilled and intelligent -- and being an 
elitist.  I think its pretty clear which of our politicians fall under which 
label.

>I'm wondering what the Conservapedia people are doing with the
>recently raised possibility that atomic decay rates vary with solar
>activity. 

I had the same thought about the rate of atomic decay.  I haven't looked it up 
on Conservapedia yet.

Olin
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Nick Arnett<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion<mailto:[email protected]> 
  Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:38 AM
  Subject: Re: On Topic shocker!


  On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Olin Elliott <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

  > >This is starting to sound like Asimov's Meritocracy branch of power.
  >
  > But how would a Meritocracy play in a time when even pronouncing the names
  > of foreign countries correctly gets you labeled an elitist?  The Right has
  > sold America on the idea that anyone with a good education and the ability
  > to think critically is an "elitist" who couldn't possibly understand the
  > problems of soccer moms and joe six pack.  What would they think of a
  > council of scientists, most of whom probably believe the earth is more than
  > six thousand years old and even in *gasp* evolution?


  Well, we just elected an elitist as president, by a substantial majority.

  Meanwhile, I'm wondering what the Conservapedia people are doing with the
  recently raised possibility that atomic decay rates vary with solar
  activity.  I couldn't help immediately imagining somebody using that idea to
  show that the earth really is only a few thousand years old.

  Nick
  _______________________________________________
  
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l<http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l>
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to