"gav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 02:52:33PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > > No, restrictive trademarks aren't real. This is pain invented by > > overlegislation and protectionism. > > Maybe I'm missing something here, but wouldn't it be as simple as TPF using a > Creative Commons licence for the logo? [...] > Something like Attribution, Non-Commercial and Share Alike?
I think most of the Creative Commons licences are copyright licences, with a few patent ones in there (ccGPL3?). It's the onion and camel trademarks which are problems and wouldn't be covered by a copyright licence. I'd not even considered whether copyright is a problem yet! Non-Commercial would make t-shirt sales impossible without obtaining more permission. Hope that explains, -- MJ Ray (slef) Webmaster for hire, statistician and online shop builder for a small worker cooperative http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ (Notice http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html) tel:+44-844-4437-237 _______________________________________________ BristolBathPM mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm
