"Paul Makepeace" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Amias Channer <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> > Linking to your own posts which only link to another of your own
> > posts is not considered evidence in book.

The link was meant to show it in context, not as evidence.  It's an
opinion and unlikely to have evidence.  Sorry for any confusion.

> > As far as i have heard the GSOC thing came out of google needing some
> > particularly difficult advances in several open source projects
> > and finding a way to help this happen without having to try to
> > own the people who could do it. [...]

That's a plausible reason for Google to do it.  As long as that's
understood by everyone, we all win from it.

> Google supports open source because supporting open source is good,
> and open source has supported Google. It encourages young developers
> to work on open source projects which helps everyone. More here:
> http://code.google.com/opensource/gsoc/2008/faqs.html#0.1_goals

Sorry, that's BS.  Like all Delaware Inc's, they're legally forbidden
from doing anything except maximise Google's share value.  They may
claim they're doing it "because supporting open source is good," but
that's only because that claim maximises Google's share value.  If
more people called it out as the BS it is, they'd stop claiming it.

Claims like that are why GSOC isn't a win for everyone.

[...]
> But congrats to MJ for the most cynical post on here so far ;-)
> Reminds me of http://xkcd.com/192/

No, when they came emailing years ago, I sent them a short rebuke.
I'd prefer to leave computing than leave the cooperative sector.

> > So come on MJ what is it , what did they do to you ?

In short, externalising their costs onto the wider web and helping
governments to repress information.

Hope that explains,
-- 
MJ Ray (slef)
Webmaster for hire, statistician and online shop builder for a small
worker cooperative http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ http://mjr.towers.org.uk/
(Notice http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html) tel:+44-844-4437-237
_______________________________________________
BristolBathPM mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm

Reply via email to