Stewart Smith wrote:
> No, it's definitely way OTT! Surely some sort of guidance or firm
> warning would be appropriate in the first instance rather than a public
> kicking and a ban.

I agree partially - it was a bit harsh, but not as much as that.

> After all, it's not as though the poster is a pesky
> recruitment consultant who stands to gain anything by spamming all the
> local lists (it didn't seem to hit [_] BTW unless I'm mistaken) so
> really should just be viewed as a misguided person trying to be helpful.
> 
> As for the statement above, you really shouldn't mistake the actions of
> one individual as those of the entire company.

A corporation has no actions except those of its employees and
contractors on its behalf.  If it was just a misguided person,
that is the fault of the corporation for not providing proper
guidance, or maybe we will hear of the correction in future.

I don't see why recruitment consultants in general are singled
out for special abuse.  There are some bad ones but some good too.

Was it on-topic here?  OK, lots of us use perl for sysadmin tasks
(perl -i.bak -p -e 'script' file is invaluable), but is that even
welcome at Aardman Animations?

In reply to Alex Ross: I think some anti-PHP sentiment is because the
PHP 3/4 switch seemed to cause much more pain than the perl 4/5
switch, then there's been similar pain again with PHP 4/5 - PHP is not
learning from history and dooming PHP programmers to repeat it.

Compare that to 

    Perl 6 will provide a "Perl 5 compatibility mode"
    http://dev.perl.org/perl6/faq.html

which is even a step forwards from the "edit it to /usr/bin/perl4" days.

So, it's much more than simple Editor/OS Wars snobbery, isn't it?


And being welcoming doesn't mean that we have to let off-topic spam
pass without comment.  Welcoming != free-for-all.

Regards,
-- 
MJ Ray (slef)  Webmaster and LMS developer at     | software
www.software.coop http://mjr.towers.org.uk        |  .... co
IMO only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html |  .... op
_______________________________________________
BristolBathPM mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm

Reply via email to