I think what Jamie meant was that the results for tour 3 were
Clapham 2
Druids
Chevy
Clapham 1
So if Clapham 2 dropped out then why did Clapham 1 get seeded 1st for tour 4?
Crispy
OW!, Teamshark
-----Original Message-----
>From : Jakob Donkersloot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : 12 September 2001 13:20:36
Subject : RE: Final Tour Rankings and Nationals Seedings
how the hell did you work that out ?
>
>(going by Chris' list)
>Clapham 1 after 3 events : 710 points
>Clapham 2 : 702
>Chevvy : 644
>Fusion 1 : 596
>Druids : 592
>Team Shark : 585
>LLL : 575
>Red : 530
>S & G : 460
>
>take away Clapham 2 and what do you get?
>
>Hedge.
>(YBK,NR,etc...)
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jaimie Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 12 September 2001 04:54
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Final Tour Rankings and Nationals Seedings
>
>
>If it was indeed Clapham 2 who withdrew from Tour 4, then it wasn't just LLL
>
>who were wrongly seeded!! Clapham 1 should have been seeded 3rd, Chevy 2nd,
>and Druids 1st.
>
>Jaimie
>LLL
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
Get a fun email address at http://another.com
COOL: Personalise a t-shirt with your name/email/slogan
from 9.99 pounds. CLICK HERE http://another-shop.com
