>So if Clapham 2 dropped out then why did Clapham 1 get seeded 1st for tour
4?
And should we penalise LeedsLeedsLeeds more points for getting more of the
seedings wrong? ;-)
Seriously now, I assume common sense dictated that aspect of the seeding.
Clapham 2 finished above Clapham 1 at Southampton for 2 reasons: we'd paid
some attention to the teams Aram had picked (and err, the rather stacked
Clapham 2 which he himself was playing on), we'd murmured to him but hadn't
pushed our point; and secondly Clapham 1 was weakened on the day by injuries
to two or three of the better players.
In retrospect the Tour rules probably need some kind of amendment to cope
with that kind of freak occurrence (along the lines of 'if geo teams have
two teams the first team always takes the seeding of the higher placed team
in the previous event'), but common sense was an adequate substitute in this
case.
You're right though that Tour rules appear to have been broken. Noone said
anything as at the time it seemed the eminently sensible thing to do. In any
case, we were completely passive subjects of the seeding and I hope it's not
us who gets caned with more penalty points!
lol
rt
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 September 2001 13:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Final Tour Rankings and Nationals Seedings
I think what Jamie meant was that the results for tour 3 were
Clapham 2
Druids
Chevy
Clapham 1
So if Clapham 2 dropped out then why did Clapham 1 get seeded 1st for tour
4?
Crispy
OW!, Teamshark
-----Original Message-----
>From : Jakob Donkersloot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : 12 September 2001 13:20:36
Subject : RE: Final Tour Rankings and Nationals Seedings
how the hell did you work that out ?
>
>(going by Chris' list)
>Clapham 1 after 3 events : 710 points
>Clapham 2 : 702
>Chevvy : 644
>Fusion 1 : 596
>Druids : 592
>Team Shark : 585
>LLL : 575
>Red : 530
>S & G : 460
>
>take away Clapham 2 and what do you get?
>
>Hedge.
>(YBK,NR,etc...)
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jaimie Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 12 September 2001 04:54
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Final Tour Rankings and Nationals Seedings
>
>
>If it was indeed Clapham 2 who withdrew from Tour 4, then it wasn't just
LLL
>
>who were wrongly seeded!! Clapham 1 should have been seeded 3rd, Chevy 2nd,
>and Druids 1st.
>
>Jaimie
>LLL
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
Get a fun email address at http://another.com
COOL: Personalise a t-shirt with your name/email/slogan
from 9.99 pounds. CLICK HERE http://another-shop.com
-----------------------------------------------------------
Internet communications are not secure and therefore Oyster Partners Ltd
does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any
views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Oyster Partners Ltd.
