>Roger said the Open doesn't have much of a portfolio. I'd agree, but that's
>only because it has been a struggling event, with problems locating a
>suitable venue. Given time, I would expect this to become a respected
event.

True, but have you seen how packed the 2002 calendar is already? We're
getting pretty well organised now as a community, and have a damned good
schedule laid out for 2002 - maybe we should look again at whether we need a
'BUF Open'. At least discuss why we have it.

Is it the Worthington Cup of our football-analogy world? I very much doubt
Clapham would rush to enter a first team, especially as half of us will be
learning to surf on Honolulu beach that weekend :-)

I feel guilty for saying that because Nolan's a good friend and ex-teammate,
but wasn't the unique selling proposition for this event to invite our
friends from over the water to come and spend their time and Euros with us?
At a time when we didn't have as many tournaments as we do now. Couldn't we
just open ALL the tour events to any Euro teams which want to play, and host
one of those in Brighton or Eastbourne to make it easy for them (a la
Southampton)? Let's face it, the Xlr8rs are more likely to want to play a
Co-ed tour than mix it with our top 8 teams.

Sorry to complicate the discussion.

Can't wait for the first competetive tournament of the season, Winter League
#3,

Silver Bear
cu#1

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Cotgreave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 January 2002 11:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Nationals move


I would also agree that Nationals isn't played at the right time of year.
I've seen too many finals played in horrific conditions. When a game
descends into a game against the elements, it's gone too far. We should do
what we can to lessen that risk. 

Roger said the Open doesn't have much of a portfolio. I'd agree, but that's
only because it has been a struggling event, with problems locating a
suitable venue. Given time, I would expect this to become a respected event.

Andy
Chevron


 -----------------------------------------------------------
Internet communications are not secure and therefore Oyster Partners Ltd
does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any
views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Oyster Partners Ltd.

Reply via email to