>So we don't know whether Clapham 2 might be prevented from participating >at a 'smaller' Tour event.
Chris Hughes (then DoC) and the u8c stated at the time: >This is the agreed punishment from u8c: >Blacklist Clapham 2 for the next tour event (Tour 1 2002) as per the rules. So it has no consquences for future Tour events, and therefore shouldn't impact our preparations for Hawaii. Thankfully. c u all in Bristol, in the bar if not on the field, rt cu#1 -----Original Message----- From: Wayne Retter [mailto:druid#[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 April 2002 00:47 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Disqualifications "blacklisting" is covered in the Tour Rules, to be found at http://www.ukultimate.com/docs/tour2002rules.htm Clapham 2 are allowed to play at T1 I just realised, however, that the Rules don't specify how long the Blacklist entry stands for - one event? one year? for ever?. So we don't know whether Clapham 2 might be prevented from participating at a 'smaller' Tour event. Can of worms !? Wayne Thu, 11 Apr 2002, by Christian Nistri <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Subject: Disqualifications >below is what was written last year after Tour $ re: clapham 2 - what does >blacklisted mean? >wigsy ---------------------------------------------------------------- Wayne Retter mobile: 07970-903420 [EMAIL PROTECTED] office: 01737-273655 ----------------------------------------------------------- Internet communications are not secure and therefore Oyster Partners Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Oyster Partners Ltd.
