Si/Roger/Britdisc,

Yes teams should be treated equally, but many would say that the two
team system doesn't do that. The ability to move players between tours
and up to the last minute on a Saturday morning is a huge advantage and
one that only a handful of teams in the UK have the player base to take
advantage off, and one that has been widely criticized. I have
consistently argued for it both as a Clapham player and a Shark for all
the reasons Si and Roj have pointed out, but on balance it also has it's
disadvantages. Most notably that it can result in lack of semi final and
final (though not this season :-) ) experience practice for the up and
coming teams (a lack of which we aptly demonstrated in Tour 3 :( ) and
it is a maybe a shame that it is only in Tour 4 that we will have the
chance to play the full clapham hawaii team and see how far off we are
to being competitive with a top 8 team at worlds! It would be an
extremely bad precedent to set to allow the two team system, but then
allow roster changes when it was no longer appropriate, IMO that would
be too much of an advantage. It sucks for Steve but he knew the rules
when he rostered and it's not like Clapham 2 haven't pulled out of tour
4 before. Imagine the potential unbalancing of teams if all of your 7
2nd team players had all made the request that Steve made?

That being said think that Chevy coed's request is even less founded as
they themselves say they had premeditated this change. 

It seems reasonable to me that Druids should be allowed their pickup
with no penalty due to unforeseen circumstances. Perhaps in the interest
of allowing the best preparation for Hawaii Chevy Coed should be allowed
their pickups but at the expense of being considered unrostered for open
nationals (similarly for strange blue)?

Just my personal views, I'll leave the official TS response to Milk,

Boston
(Teamshark)





Hmmmmm,

>However, after pleading from two of the teams in question (Druids and
>Chevron Mixed) we have agreed to put this matter to the other teams in
the
>Tour who might end up playing them.

>We are not prepared to offer this to the Clapham 2 players as their
team
>intentionally dropped out of the tournament and agreeing to their
request
>could not benefit any teams attending the World Clubs.

Whatever happenned to teams being treated equally? I'm sure none of the
teams at Tour 4 would have any more objection to Steve Balls playing on
a
non-Clapham team (probably Strange Blue) than they would Frankie playing
with the Purple Menace, but for some reason (which I'm sure is not at
all
related to us being the well-loved No1 team) we seem to have been
deprived
such equal opportunity.

The fact is that us playing as a Hawaii squad WILL benefit our team at
World
Clubs, that much surely is obvious? As that leaves Steve Balls (and a
couple
of less significant others) in the cold he would like to play on another
team. And as an association concerned with the wellbeing of your
individual
members it ought to be something you care about as much as teams'
wellbeing.
Your statement that 'agreeing to their request could not benefit any
teams
attending the World Clubs' is therefore simplistic and inaccurate, and
if
your earlier assertion that 'we could have foreseen it' is reason to
disallow it, then Chevron's confession that they always intended to make
a
change should meant you treated them the same as us.

Roster rules are there to prevent teams changing over the Tour so that
stable teams are encouraged in the long run, and so that the points from
events depend more on differing performances than revolving door
personnel.
Any judgement ought to be taken on those grounds. Steve Balls' inclusion
on
the Strange Blue team this weekend surely will have less impact Chevvy
co-ed
gaining 3 players and Whey and Fusion losing key players.

This is an amateur sport, what's the poor lad done to deserve being cut
out?
So his serious injury prevented him from making our Hawaii team; the
fact
our two team structure has until now accommodated him should be looked
on as
a positive thing, not a negative thing. All season we thought we'd be
able
to field 2 teams, but only recently have some players 2nd team players
been
injured, others have moved abroad or are travelling - in a way we could
not
have anticipated. We were very close to getting 2 teams (had 7 on the
2nd),
but could not quite make it.

On those grounds I would feel obliged to object to at least one (if not
both) of the other requests unless your stance on Steve Balls were
reconsidered immediately.

Free the Cambridge One!








-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Ben Ravilious
Sent: 19 July 2002 00:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Simon Norris; Charles Heenan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tyler;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; carol gardiner; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Simon Hill; James
Hammersley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; rikshipley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; White,
Tom; cormac cosgrove; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [BD] Tour 4 Roster Change requests #2


(apologies if you get this more than once - my initial attempt doesn't
seem
to have got through)

Dear Tour 4 participants,

As you know we have had (and rejected) a number of requests to bend the
Tour
rules for the benefit of teams going to the World Club Championships in
Hawaii. It is the view of the UKU board that these rules should be
respected.

However, after pleading from two of the teams in question (Druids and
Chevron Mixed) we have agreed to put this matter to the other teams in
the
Tour who might end up playing them.

In the case of the Druids, if we receive no objections from teams in the
1-16 bracket (or from Marty McFly) then we would be prepared to allow
them
their requested pick-up.

In the case of Chevron Mixed, if we receive no objections from teams
seeded
1-24 then we would be prepared to allow their requested pick-ups.

Below are the requests from Druids and Chevron Mixed and also the
seedings
for the tournament.

I would like objections against either of the requests from *official
team
representatives* sent to me by 5pm on Friday afternoon at the latest.

We are not prepared to offer this to the Clapham 2 players as their team
intentionally dropped out of the tournament and agreeing to their
request
could not benefit any teams attending the World Clubs.

Your call.

Ben Ravilious
UKU President

==============================================================

REQUEST FROM FLUID DRUIDS

Dear All

I am writing on behalf of Fluid Druids to ask a boon of you all.

We would like to have Frank Collins (Martie Mcfly & Mythago) play for us
at
Tour 4 as he has now joined our squad to go to Hawaii.

The facts

We started with a squad of 17 (we have proven ourselves to be to
incompetent
to run a larger squad)
Karl Mann was badly injured at Eastbourne removing him until at least
Nationals. He plays a minimum of 60% of all points.
We have 5 other whinjuries / injuries which have left us with 11 / 12
players come the end of the last 3 outdoor tournies we have entered.
Hawaii is going to be hot and hard so we decided to add to our numbers.
Frank has trained with us (he is keen) over the last month looking to
improve his game.
This makes him the obvious choice.
We asked him to join us 8 days ago and immeadiately asked the UKU's
permission.
Our situation was not reasonably foreseeable

The reasons we want you to help

The above show we need help!
Having Frank play a Tour will help him "gel" with the team and also
enable
him to step up his level of play before we have him on pitch in Hawaii.
It will help us to play better in Hawaii hence improving a British teams
chances.

The reason against.

Its against Tour rules.


We need your help.
The UKU has kindly let us ask you the teams and players directly.
If one team objects Frank will not play for us in the Tour.

Thankyou for your time
Fluid Druids


==============================================================

REQUEST FROM CHEVRON MIXED


Chevron coed would like to alter their roster for tour iv. The squad
would
like to include up to 3 of their male players who are going to Hawaii.
These
players have been playing for Whey and Fusion at previous Tours.

Why are we doing this?

We always wanted to make this change in Tour IV if possible for the
following reasons:

1. Whey and Fusion would have been substantially weakened if we had
played
with the full Hawaii squad in all events and this would have damaged the
long term prospects for those teams

2. At the same time, Chevron coed is representing UK ultimate. It is
important for us as a team, and as UK representatives, to have the best
preparation possible. Every opportunity to play together will help us
greatly, especially now the WUCC is just 2 weeks away.

This will undoubtedly improve our squad for this weekend; it will also
weaken the squads we are taking players from. We hope this will not be
seen
as a malicious intent to improve our position in the tour rankings - our
aim
in the Open tour has not been to achieve the best possible tour ranking,
but
to allow the team to gain valuable playing experience. This weekend is
the
final stage in the strategy that we planned back in April.

Thanks

Andy

PS - as it stands, it looks like the headrush players (Al, Wayne, Finn)
are
going to have to play with Headrush, because that team is struggling for
numbers, leaving Pete from Whey (who has a knee injury), Barry and Ed
from
Fusion.


==============================================================

SEEDINGS FOR TOUR 4

(1-16 + Marty McFly may object to Druids request)
(1-24 may object to Chevron Mixed request)


1. CLAPHAM
2. TEAMSHARK
3. CHEVRON ACTION FLASH
4. DRUIDS
5. RED 1
6. UNPOCOLOCO
7. LEEDSLEEDSLEEDS
8. SMASH & GRAB
9. HAMMERAGE 1
10. FUSION
11. WHEY
12. FLYGHT CLUB 1
13. HEADRUSH
14. MUD CULTURE
15. STRANGE BLUE
16. CHEVRON CO-ED
17. BAF
18. MARTY MCFLY
19. STD
20. SLIPDISC
21. HAMMERAGE 2
22. REVOLUTIONS
23. SWIVEL
24. KAMAMAYA





__________________________________________________
BritDisc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pootle.near.me.uk/mailman/listinfo/britdisc

__________________________________________________
BritDisc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pootle.near.me.uk/mailman/listinfo/britdisc

__________________________________________________
BritDisc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pootle.near.me.uk/mailman/listinfo/britdisc

Reply via email to