Jon,

UTB came 3rd at tour 1 and 17th at tour 2 because of personnel issue at the latter. We are still not sure which team will be able to attend tour 3, it could be something in between.

B tour teams do not, in general, have the consitentcy of personnel fund in the A tour and I feel that the current format is therefore more appropriate. B tours teams who do turn in consistent results will be rewarded with a higher postition at the end of the season so are not penalised by the current format.


-- Regards, Paul Holden, UTB mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jon Palmer wrote:
BD,

Following the general theme of improving the structure of the tour can
something be done to change the B tour structure?


First of all why do we insist on the insanity of restricting ourselves to
formats that allow any team to win? After Tour 1 there is no way that team
outside the top 8 let alone the top 16 is going to win the B tour. We accept
that this is true in the A tour so why not admit it in the B tour where the
gap between the top and bottom is significantly larger.


Why not have a different format for the B tour? Why not use a format that
gives the top and bottom teams a better standard of game against teams more
of their ability? I would suggest:

B Tour Top 16

Saturday
Four pools of four (takes three rounds)
5-12 crossovers for placement into the quarter finals

Sunday
Q, S, F for 1st Q, S, F for 9th




Run on 4 pitched this format requires 7 rounds on the Saturday and 6 rounds
on the Sunday. If you play from 9-6 that equates to something like 60 minute
games with 10 minutes for the cap on Saturday and either longer games or
longer caps on the Sunday.


B Tour Bottom N (N <= 16) (The C Tour)

Use what ever format suits for the number of teams that are entered. Using a
maximum of 4 pitches.


B-C Tour Crossover round Last thing on the Saturday run a crossover round between the bottom 4 in the B tour and the top 4 in the C tour for promotion/relegation between the two halves.


With my previous suggestion for the A tour format to use pools of four you would get:

A Tour:                 8 pitches, 6 games of 90 minutes, 60 minutes rest
B Tour top 16:  4 pitches, 7 games of 60+ minutes, 70 minutes rest
C Tour bot N:   <=4 pitches, ~7 games of 60+ minutes, 70 minutes rest
Women's Tour:   2 pitches, 7 games of 60+ minutes, 70 minutes rest


Wouldn't that be a fairer and better system with more meaning full longer games for all teams in all divisions? If you had a full C tour of 16 teams you would need 18 pitches. If like at tour 2 you had only 13 teams for the C tour you could easily write a schedule that used 3 pitches for the C Tour.


JP




__________________________________________________ BritDisc mailing list [email protected] http://zion.ranulf.net/mailman/listinfo/britdisc Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/informed.asp



__________________________________________________ BritDisc mailing list [email protected] http://zion.ranulf.net/mailman/listinfo/britdisc Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/informed.asp

Reply via email to