> As for their opinions on contested calls we always have the option to send it > back as though the "foul" never occurred therefore negating the need once > again!
I wouldn't say it negates the need at all - occasionally, sending the disc back is agreed by both parties to be the fairest solution, but more often than not it means that the two players disagree vastly on what happened. I like being able to explain what I thought happened & quite often calls / contests are retracted by either myself or my opponent, but if it's clear cut and discussions bear no fruit, I would prefer to have a neutral third party who could cast the deciding vote, than to simply send the disc back & therefore advantage the offence every time. Felix ps. we are digressing from what the Rylands was about really, I'm not even sure if the organisers of it are in favour of observers or against __________________________________________________ BritDisc mailing list [email protected] http://www.fysh.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/britdisc Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/staying-informed
