that's nice to know. I will get to the task.
Thanks
Animesh Garg
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:27 AM, brlcad <brl...@mac.com> wrote:
>
>
> Possibly, I did not word my question correctly. I understand that all the
> contribution *during/for* GSoC is open source. My query was about the
> importance of 'previous' code being open source to prove competence.
>
>
> Ah, yes, then I completely misunderstood your question. My bad. You
> don't need to provide previous code to demonstrate competence. That's what
> makes a patch submission so valuable. It's optional, but a good patch
> demonstrates competence better than code you've worked on previously. A
> few hours reading code and figuring out some minor feature or bug fix shows
> you know how to read code and can quickly make a minor change that improves
> the code. So yeah, we don't want to see your proprietary code or class
> homework assignments. ;)
>
> Cheers!
> Sean
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF email is sponsosred by:
> Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
> _______________________________________________
> BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
> brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
