On Jun 28, 2013, at 12:55 PM, Harmanpreet Singh wrote: > Your idea is great and I'm really excited. In fact I started moving in > this direction and will share what I did on another mail just after > writing this. Do I need to make changes in my GSoC proposal and is > this task enough for GSoC? Do you think I should make an elaborated > write up for this task?
I defer to the other mentors, perhaps your reviewing mentor, on that particular point. > I will be happy to write the page but frankly speaking I will need > extensive input from your side. Will it be a part of GSoC or can I > accomplish it afterwards? The few e-mails that were exchanged over the past week should provide all the inputs needed, so it's more about organizing that information into a succinctly and clearly understandable form. A very brief wiki article with a couple paragraphs is all that's needed, maybe a diagram if you think it'd help. It's important to be done earlier rather than later because you'll be able to word it in a manner that cannot be easily written by someone well-versed with the problem domain and the information is fresh now. Moreover, if you understand the issues (and hopefully now you do), it shouldn't take you more than an hour and will help others *tremendously*. If there are holes in your understanding, then it will be a great GSoC-worthy development activity as this understanding is still critical for creating a viewer. Writing it all down helps clarify the thoughts. Cheers! Sean ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ BRL-CAD Developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
