On Jul 3, 2013, at 2:54 AM, Harmanpreet Singh wrote: > As a quick review, contact page looks odd.
Odd in what way? Does something look wrong? Have to say what odd means to do anything about it... > Color scheme is better than > earlier one but still seeks improvement. I know it is just a start and > things will keep improving. While I appreciate the positivity, it's not useful in this context.. This is not just a start (at least not by me). It's the same design we've had for too many years. Moreover, I have no intention of taking this design any further without specific suggestions. :) I've already spent far more time on it than intended. I'm really just interested in hearing reports about any actual *problems* on the existing site -- not to discuss general web design platitudes... This was not a redesign nor intended to be one. That's why I'm mostly wanting to know if anything is not displaying correctly, hopefully before release announcements start spreading around the web. > GCI mock ups are really helpful in this > regard. The third design by Nikita showed a decent concept that someone could turn into a working prototype. I'm not particularly fond of the color scheme, but the overall layout is reasonable. The other three mock-ups, however, do not look helpful at all. Sean ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ BRL-CAD Developer mailing list brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
