On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 24, 2013, at 02:48 PM, Tom Browder <[email protected]> wrote:> > Sounds good to me, but shouldn't it be "ENABLE_C_POSIX_COMPLIANCE?" > Then, when we decide on what it should be, we can define a > "ENABLE_CXX_POSIX_COMPLIANCE" option. ... > I was thinking just one flag to mean either/both, similar to how > ENABLE_STRICT basically means "use -Werror everywhere we can" but it applies
Gotcha--WILCO. -Tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ BRL-CAD Developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
