On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Nicholas Reed <[email protected]> wrote: >> But I don't think the %z changes in other files are so bad--should be >> C89 portable, no? > > I'd argue that since bu_log is not a C89 function, its set of > supported format specifiers should not be altered to conform to C89 or
Okay, Nicholas, I think I've been waving a white flag based on the false positives for strict C99/POSIX builds I've been getting. I've implemented changes Sean pointed out and I expect my objections to %V to go away real soon (about 16 minutes more compilation time will tell the tale). Best, -Tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ BRL-CAD Developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
