On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Tom Browder <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay, changes took and all the warnings about '%V' disappeared with > strict C99/POSIX.
But that now begs the question of whether we should continue to use %V: Nicholas votes yes. Personally, I don't thinks it's justified, and it shouldn't be a great loss now that bu_vls_cstr is available. But I'll take no action to remove %V without further guidance. Best, -Tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ BRL-CAD Developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
