Chintan, > A lot of features in OGV have already been incorporated including > authentication (including 3rd party logins), authorization, dashboard > features, a variety of views to choose from for the models, and a foundation > for sharing and following the models and design owners (which btw includes > comments, likes, following etc.). > > I sincerely oppose the idea of shifting all these functionalities onto a new > framework. We have already shifted from PHP to a Javascript framework in the > past, and yet the project has not turned up as a complete product.
He makes a pretty compelling case for not migrating to CI and would likely be one of your active collaborators or mentors, so I strongly encourage you to either adjust your proposal accordingly (feel free to discuss it more as needed) or try scoping a different project. Students own your proposals, though, so you should stand behind whatever you propose. If you don’t like the direction something is going, that would be a good case to look for a different project to work on that you will like. We should deploy what we have with OGV now before changing much anything else. As GSoC only affords minimal time for testing and deployment, that will complicate what constitutes a good proposal here. Last year, OGV deployment was held up by a FreeBSD kernel module that was required by MongoDB, but that should be resolved now. Cheers! Sean ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://makebettercode.com/inteldaal-eval _______________________________________________ BRL-CAD Developer mailing list brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
