[quoted lines by Hammer Attila on 2024/12/30 at 17:53 +0100] >I think the 1000 or 2000 MS perhaps will be too long wait time. What do you >think?
I'd still like to know how high it needs to be to work reliably without hard-coding the baud. >If you thinking need more increasing the wait time with larger value from 500 >Ms, I will be repeat the test. Yes, I'd appreciate that testing. >So, BRLTTY is more time right starting this USB adapter when I using the -d >ttyACM0+baud=57600 option. I think that's because there's a longer delay since that sets the 57600 baud a little bit earlier. >Normal -d ttyACM0, or -d /dev/ttyACM0 newer automatically changing the baud >rate in adapter side this usb serial adapter my experiences. There are four variants that all mean the very same thing: serial:ttyACM0, serial:/dev/ttyACM0, ttyACM0, /dev/ttyACM0 This is all for backward compatibility to when brltty only supported serial communication, i.e. the /dev/ absolute path prefix is optional and the serial: communiction method is optional. The correct syntax is serial:ttyACM0. You asked earlier (but I forgot to quote it) if you can specify the baud parameter in brltty.conf - yes, you can. For example: braille-device serial:ttyACM0+baud=57600 Since the delay seems to need to be so high, I think I'll probably add another serial device parameter for that. -- I believe the Bible to be the very Word of God: http://Mielke.cc/bible/ Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | WebHome: http://Mielke.cc/ EMail: [email protected] | Ottawa, Ontario | Twitter: @Dave_Mielke Phone: +1 613 726 0014 | Canada K2A 1H7 | http://mielke.cc/xmother.html (Letter from a Feminist ex-Mother) _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://brltty.app/mailman/listinfo/brltty
