[quoted lines by Eric Scheibler on 2026/01/18 at 14:34 +0100] >> I'm thinking of calling the 6.7 style a "word" and the 6.5 style a "part". >> Are those okay or can anyone think of better terms? > >Part or maybe token?
My problem with token is what to do with the non-identifier characters. The term token imlies, at least to me, some knowledge of the current language being viewed. And another question: Do we assign the part/token set to the original bindings (i.e. fix what became broken) or do we assign the word set to the original bindings (i.e. preserve what we now have and add back the lost feature)? -- I believe the Bible to be the very Word of God: http://Mielke.cc/bible/ Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | WebHome: http://Mielke.cc/ EMail: [email protected] | Ottawa, Ontario | Twitter: @Dave_Mielke Phone: +1 613 726 0014 | Canada K2A 1H7 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://mielke.cc/xmother.html (Letter from a Feminist ex-Mother) _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://brltty.app/mailman/listinfo/brltty
