On Tue, 06 Dec 2016 09:20:31 -0500,
Dave Mielke wrote:
>
> [quoted lines by Samuel Thibault on 2016/12/06 at 14:39 +0100]
>
> >> but it only gave me the first process, did not follow the pipe as
> >> follows
> >
> >That's expected, strace only traces one process and its potential child.
> >To trace all processes of the pipeline, put strace in front of each
> >command of the pipeline.
>
> What I had in mind was strace -f in front of the linuxdoc command. Or, maybe
> easier, in front of the make command. That's the only way to be sure to catch
> all of it.
The actual linuxdoc command is a perl program, so I am not sure you
will get much out of the trace, but I can try.
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covici
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list.
To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected]
For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
