On 11/01/2012 03:35 PM, Seth Hall wrote:
> I've discussed changing the Notice::policy notice handling mechanism with a 
> few people and I think that generally everyone agrees that the current 
> mechanism, while very powerful, sucks from a usability perspective.  This is 
> a good thing to address now since we're either on the precipice of repeating 
> a mistake to more frameworks or adapting to a style that is easier to 
> understand.  I'm going to give an example of how I think it could work in an 
> evented model now.  Please shoot holes. :)
>
> These implement the decidedly silly case of sending a notice to an email if 
> the SSH connection originated locally.
>
> event Notice::policy(n: Notice::Info)
>       {
>       if ( n$note == SSH::Login &&
>            Site::is_local_host(n$id$orig_h) )
>               {
>               add n$actions[Notice::ACTION_EMAIL];
>               }
>       }
>
> That would be replacement to the current model of this:
>
> redef Notice::policy += {
>       [$pred(n: Notice::Info) = {
>               return ( n$note == SSH::Login && 
> Site::is_local_host(n$id$orig_h) );
>        },
>        $action = Notice::ACTION_EMAIL],
> };
>
> Here are some random thoughts about these two approaches in no particular 
> order:
>
>   - The evented model (top one) is more Bro-y and easier which is a BIG plus.
>
>   - The PolicyItem model (bottom one) has the ability to halt further 
> processing with the $halt attribute of PolicyItems.  I don't think I'm 
> convinced that this is a huge issue.
>
>   - The evented model has latency from the event queue, but I don't think 
> this is a huge issue.  The latency is normally ok.  Jon, is it an issue for 
> the file analysis framework?  I don't remember.  The actions being applied 
> would be processed through an event queue too so they will be processed after 
> the policy events anyway.
>
>   - Code block prioritization is built into the evented model using the 
> &priority attribute.  It's specifically implemented for PolicyItem model.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>    .Seth
>

I like this idea (it seems MUCH easier to use).  How would
"suppress_for" be implemented in the evented model?

_______________________________________________
bro-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev

Reply via email to