Dammit.
On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:11 PM, Seth Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
> There would be some work that would need to be done to deal with edge cases
> brought about by smashing scopes together like this, but I think it should be
> possible to watch for locals being created and making sure that there aren't
> any conflicting names (Bro should probably not start up if there are
> conflicting names).
Actually, nevermind. I'm not fully thinking through the scope smashing. We
could just create a scope for each of the function implementations…
>> function foobar(a: count) &priority=5
>> {
>> local test = "nope";
>> print test;
>> }
>>
>> function foobar(a: count) &priority=8
>> {
>> local test = "yup";
>> print test;
>> }
Those would inline into this…
function foobar(a: count)
{
{
local test = "nope";
print test;
}
{
local test = "yup";
print test;
}
}
The only problem is that this doesn't currently work, but it begs the question…
should it?
.Seth
--
Seth Hall
International Computer Science Institute
(Bro) because everyone has a network
http://www.bro-ids.org/
_______________________________________________
bro-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
