On Apr 19, 2013, at 12:10 PM, David Mandelberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is http://tracker.bro.org/bro/ticket/981 a bug, or did I misunderstand > how the language is supposed to work? Provided that &default for tables is not supposed to modify table membership when accessing indices that don't exist, the example you gave looked correct to me (i.e. not a bug) Since foo[0] and foo[1] are never actually entries in the table, you're always working directly with the value associated with the &default attribute whenever you access the table at those indices. - Jon _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
