On Apr 19, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Robin Sommer <[email protected]> wrote: > An alternative would be to have the lookup return a copy of the > default, but not modify the table.
I think this is reasonable and the way I'd expect it to work at least. I've never seen anyone doing things with &default that would violate it either. On the upside I've never seen anyone give a non-constant &default value. .Seth -- Seth Hall International Computer Science Institute (Bro) because everyone has a network http://www.bro.org/ _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
