On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 22:09 +0000, you wrote: > other than what their OS repos provide. IMO, that's fine, just not > sure if it was anticipated and fine with others as well?
Interesting that you ask, I was actually about to write an email about this. :) I'm aware that this a recent CMake feature. I have used it for now because it feels like the right thing to do here. The alternative would be creating lots of *.a libraries and then linking them all in. That should work too, but it's not really nice. (One probably could also manually collect all the *.o across the sub-dirs, but that's even worse I think). I wanted to pose exactly the question you bring up: what cmake version can we require these days? I'd be reluctant to up the requirement if it meant installing new cmakes for a large share of our users. From your mail it sounds like that could be the the case. If so, I think I'd actually prefer the *.a version for now and we could switch over to object libraries at a later time as >= 2.8.8 becomes more common. Let me know any other feedback you have on the branch. I'll do a little bit more cleanup and documetnation, maybe even later today. Robin -- Robin Sommer * Phone +1 (510) 722-6541 * [email protected] ICSI/LBNL * Fax +1 (510) 666-2956 * www.icir.org/robin _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
