I like the bagging theme, too. As one more thought, maybe the client could just be "bag" as well? It's a verb too. :)
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:54 -0700, you wrote: > > - boxer, boxes (sort of already taken by Broala's BroBox) > > - bundler, bundles (though seems like Ruby has taken this name) > > - bagger/bagboy, bags (also has the association w/ eye bags) > > - tempest, drops (eye of the storm, rain drops, eye drops... the tears > > of those trapped in dependency-hell?) > > Of those, I like "bag" the best to represent a package that can be a > "mixed bag" of scripts and compiled code. My second vote goes for > "bundle," which is also something quite intuitive for a package. The > remaining ones take a bit more think time (at least for me) to map to > something package related. > > > I favor “bagger” or “bagboy” along with “bags”. > > I did not get the "bagger" and "bagboy" variations until I googled it, > probably because I'm not a native speaker. However, I like the grocery > bag association, that one stuck immediately. We could have a shopping > "cart" as well, to represent a collection of bags. The grocery store > theme works really well, in my opinion. > > Matthias > _______________________________________________ > bro-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev > -- Robin Sommer * ICSI/LBNL * [email protected] * www.icir.org/robin _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
