On 13 Feb 2018, at 11:31, Robin Sommer wrote:

> We could even go a step further and compile CAF statically into
> libbroker, so that in the end from a user's perspective all they deal
> with is Broker: if they link against it, they get everything they
> need.
>
> Would that make sense?

I think we're quite a ways off from CAF being generally packaged with 
most operating systems (especially having the correct version to work 
with broker).  I think that including it with broker and building libcaf 
into libbroker statically makes sense too.  I've been concerned about 
the difficulty of building Bro from source too.

   .Seth

--
Seth Hall * Corelight, Inc * www.corelight.com
_______________________________________________
bro-dev mailing list
bro-dev@bro.org
http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev

Reply via email to