On 13 Feb 2018, at 11:31, Robin Sommer wrote:
> We could even go a step further and compile CAF statically into
> libbroker, so that in the end from a user's perspective all they deal
> with is Broker: if they link against it, they get everything they
> Would that make sense?
I think we're quite a ways off from CAF being generally packaged with
most operating systems (especially having the correct version to work
with broker). I think that including it with broker and building libcaf
into libbroker statically makes sense too. I've been concerned about
the difficulty of building Bro from source too.
Seth Hall * Corelight, Inc * www.corelight.com
bro-dev mailing list