On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:42 -0400, Sowmini.Varadhan at Sun.COM wrote:
> On (03/23/09 14:08), Sebastien Roy wrote:
> > # ipadm {create,modify}-interface [-t] [-f {inet, inet6}] \
> > [-if6_intf_id=<IPv6 Interface ID>] \
> > [-O <interface sub-options>] <interface>
> :
> > To that end, the IPv6 interface ID doesn't belong here IMO. This feels
> > like an IP interface property that has a default value and that is
> > settable through something like "ipadm set-prop -p interface-id=::1
> > net0".
>
> The problem with that concept is that by the time you do the set-prop,
> several addresses may have been autoconfigured with the "other" interface-id.
I don't follow. That seems like an implementation artifact. Why
couldn't the property be applied before addresses are added to the
interface?
-Seb
