On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 16:07 -0400, Girish Moodalbail wrote: > On 03/26/09 15:58, Sebastien Roy wrote: > > Sure, or an interface property. I'm wondering why you believe that a > > high-level create-interface flag is preferable to an "ipv4-only" or > > "ipv6-only" property > Nothing extraordinary, just that it's consistent with various other > commands in networking, which uses "-f" to mean address family. If > property makes more sense, then sure, property it will be. >
I don't feel strongly about it, but it feels odd to me to have some things that look like properties be settable through create-interface or modify-interface, and others settable through set-property. -Seb
