On (03/25/09 16:04), Sebastien Roy wrote: > If it's really worrisome, then I also have no problem with simply > "plumbing" both IPv4 and IPv6 always. This might actually be > preferable. If someone on the fringe has a problem with such a > configuration, then perhaps an "ipv6-only" or "ipv4-only" interface > property could be invented to appease them.
yes, that was my first thought. And the '-f' flag was the appeasement part. My fear is that making "ipadm_create_interface()" only create the virtual object will only encourage cut/paste of the plumbing code that already exists today. --Sowmini
