On (08/22/07 14:12), Artem Kachitchkine wrote: > > > I can be missing the issue completely, apologies if I do. IMHO making > stability level part of the naming scheme is generally risky. > Promotions/demotions happen and if they lead to lots of renaming, it would > lead to problems on both the consumer and provider side: disrupt
That's a very good point. If we had to change the name to promote something from public to private, in addition to all the user-surprises this would create, the upgrade procedure would have to do the task of purging the old name from the dladm repository and inserting the new one. --Sowmini
