On (08/23/07 11:51), Peter Memishian wrote: > > The whole idea of private properties is that they are unstable across > upgrades. The model you're currently proposing forces us to make a
What exactly do we mean by "unstable across upgrades"? Does it cover the case where I upgrade my machine and find that the previously private "link_foo" is now a public property? In any case, if we really feel that private properties *must* be branded with a prefix, then could we use "_link_" (or even just "_") as the prefix so that public properties can use the most natural name appropriate for that property? --Sowmini
