-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Dru wrote: > In my experience developing curricula for both bound hard copies and online > distance learning, educational institutions (both colleges and universities) > prefer to create their own non-redistributable and proprietary courseware. > (Anyone remember the big fuss when MIT launched opensourcecourseware?) If a certification body also launches courses, whether these are Open Source or not, there is a conflict of interest. It is more neutral to have the objectives public, and to let third parties deal with course development. These third parties should of course be acredited, and we should only approve of those that really give a good preparation for the exam and that are sticking to the objectives. Tille. - -- My Penguin, my freedom. http://tille.xalasys.com Books: http://writers.fultus.com/garrels -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD/CA1sIIUbMXbBA8RAhqsAJ9j5SALuKwiwlkcqFH1FcY6htbbnwCgqN+N viKTskhIfT58bNzxuWc8GzY= =bnRC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ BSDCert mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/bsdcert
