On 6/9/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Rony, > > The basic model is developer consensus. Generally, committers don't need > to get "pre-approval" for changes .. they can go ahead. However, if the > change is significant then its always community sensitive to send a > feeler before making major changes or at least committing them. It is > every committer's responsibility to keep an eye on every commit and > bring up any concerns. > > +1 for making a release of the Apache BSF version based on the current > tree. The JSR 223 stuff can go on in parallel but we should try to close > off the current tree and do a release. > > BTW I don't appear to be getting SVN commit messages - does anyone else > get them??
yes .. I got some SVN commit messages > > Sanjiva. > > On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 22:48 +0200, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > is there a procedure, set of rules I should pay attention to before > > applying changes (EngineUtils.java, Language.properties)? (Still have to > > check out my Apache id and look around the Apache development > > environment; will have some more time by the middle of July.) > > > > Also, we should talk about making BSF "Golden" (I think that Victor once > > mentioned, that he wanted to remove the debugging part before going > > Golden, but I could be mistaken) and go on with BSF 3.0 to come up with > > a version which will be JSR-223 compliant, but opensource... > > > > Regards > > > > ---rony > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cheers --Sanka --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
