On 6/9/05, Rony G. Flatscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Sanka, > > >yeah .. I've put the JSR-223 Impl in a folder called bsf3. I think we > >start working by using that code and add backward compatibility to it > >(on our way to BSF3.0 version) > > > > > Please be advised that the specs to JSR-223 are not yet fully finalized > (it's the last round, but there are quite a few changes still pending).
yes we'll wait until JSR-223 is really get finalized and then have a discussion on the architecture of BSF3.0 which will be compliant with JSR223.. > > Also, when working on making it compatible with BSF2.0 (i.e. Apache > version once it went "Golden"), I would also like to draw your attention > of a support class that I created for Rexx, which allows *any* script > language that is capable of using strings ;) to take advantage of all of > Java. More on that, once 2.0 is really finalized and once JSR-223 is > really finalized. > > Personally, I think, it is *very*, *very* important to allow BSF2.0 to > be usable (pluggable or whatever?) with/by/from BSF3.0 this way making > all of the BSF2.0 engines available to BSF3.0 right out of the box. absolutely .. I cant agree with u more. We'll discuss more on that once the BSF2.0 and JSR223 is really finalized. > > Regards, > > ---rony > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cheers !! --Sanka --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
