> +1 for using a distinct new version number for the RC. > > Is there any particular reason to select 2.5 instead of 2.4 ? ( .. > just curious ..)
Tradition dictates that unstable use 'odd' numbers whilst stable use 'even' numbers. Is this an unstable release Rony? Also is it a big enough jump to justify a whole new point release - why not 2.3.1 in dewey decimal? Kev --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
