On 2009-09-29, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29/09/2009, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 29/09/2009, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Gump has just recently started to build non-stale versions of Jython, it >>> has been building a version of before they switched to svn before that >>> (and then the build has been broken for weeks).
>>> I haven't looked into when PyJavaInstance has been removed, but it is >>> not part of the latest Jython release (2.5.1), so this probably means >>> BSF is not compatible with the latest Jython release right now, >> OK, thanks for the info. >> I was just about to release BSF; I guess we need to reconsider this. > I was forgetting that Gump is actually building 2.4; the recently > proposed release of BSF is 3.0, which is in branches/bsf3.x. I didn't know that trunk wasn't the current development branch, sorry. > We need to try building that using Gump. Are you taking a stab or do you want me to look into it? It will be interesting to see whether existing BSF users like Ant, Xalan or fulcrum will work with 3.0 as well. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org
