On 29/09/2009, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2009-09-29, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 29/09/2009, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 29/09/2009, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> Gump has just recently started to build non-stale versions of Jython, it > >>> has been building a version of before they switched to svn before that > >>> (and then the build has been broken for weeks). > > >>> I haven't looked into when PyJavaInstance has been removed, but it is > >>> not part of the latest Jython release (2.5.1), so this probably means > >>> BSF is not compatible with the latest Jython release right now, > > > >> OK, thanks for the info. > > >> I was just about to release BSF; I guess we need to reconsider this. > > > > I was forgetting that Gump is actually building 2.4; the recently > > proposed release of BSF is 3.0, which is in branches/bsf3.x. > > > I didn't know that trunk wasn't the current development branch, sorry. >
No need to apologise. > > We need to try building that using Gump. > > > Are you taking a stab or do you want me to look into it? I've added jakarta-bsf3.xml, but it probably won't work, so if you want to play with it, feel free. > It will be interesting to see whether existing BSF users like Ant, Xalan > or fulcrum will work with 3.0 as well. That's extremely unlikely; BSF 3.0 uses a completely different API from 2.4. BSF 3.0 is a JSR-223 implementation for Java 1.4 and 1.5 plus some extras. [Java 1.6 includes JSR-223.] > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org
