On 28/10/2009, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at> wrote: > > ant elder wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 6:04 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:13 PM, sebb AT ASF<s...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0 RC1 release. > >>> The artifacts are available at: > >>> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/bsf-3.0-RC1/ > >>> > >>> and the an SVN tag is at: > >>> > >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-rc1/ > >>> > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >>> > >>> S/// > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> Whats there looks good, +1 > >> > >> There's no Maven staging repo, could that be added to this vote? > >> > >> ...ant > >> > >> > > > > We never did sort out the maven artifacts of for the 1.0 release, > > which means projects using maven cant use the 1.0 release. I did put > > some artifacts up at > > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-rc1/maven/ during the > > release vote, could we consider them part of the 1.0 release vote or > > should we have another vote to release them? There was a question > > about no license header on one of the generated pom.xml files, but i'm > > not sure how to fix that easily and it doesn't seem like a release > > blocker to me. > > >
Surely the header can just be added to the file before it is deployed? > That would be fine with me. > (If a vote was demanded, I would vote +1.) Likewise. > > ---rony > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org
