On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:55 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 28/10/2009, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at> wrote: >> >> ant elder wrote: >> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 6:04 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:13 PM, sebb AT ASF<s...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0 RC1 release. >> >>> The artifacts are available at: >> >>> >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/bsf-3.0-RC1/ >> >>> >> >>> and the an SVN tag is at: >> >>> >> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-rc1/ >> >>> >> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >>> >> >>> S/// >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> Whats there looks good, +1 >> >> >> >> There's no Maven staging repo, could that be added to this vote? >> >> >> >> ...ant >> >> >> >> >> > >> > We never did sort out the maven artifacts of for the 1.0 release, >> > which means projects using maven cant use the 1.0 release. I did put >> > some artifacts up at >> > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-rc1/maven/ during the >> > release vote, could we consider them part of the 1.0 release vote or >> > should we have another vote to release them? There was a question >> > about no license header on one of the generated pom.xml files, but i'm >> > not sure how to fix that easily and it doesn't seem like a release >> > blocker to me. >> > >> > > Surely the header can just be added to the file before it is deployed? >
Fair point, ok I'll do that, and I think I call a vote on releasing them just to make sure its all clean and tidy. ...ant --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org
