> Doesn't pgBouncer also support session-level pooling? Would that be > more appropriate?
As David pointed out downstream, it wouldn't really buy anything, except an occasional prevention of PG backend startup cost. And if that is impacting you at all, you really ought to be using persistent kids/controllers anyway. From a super-quick glance at the code, I think txn-level would work, but you would have to make absolutely certain that nothing else would try to access that port (e.g. psql -U bucardo). -- Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected] End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
pgpJlIxVvU4km.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Bucardo-general mailing list [email protected] https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
