On Oct 3, 2012, at 8:34 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I’ll go ask the pgBouncer folks. Not that it matters if >> session pooling is kind of pointless. > > Well we are still aiming for txn-level, right? Yes. I think it would be beneficial for the project to confirm whether or not this is supported. We are going live without connection pooling for now, but I would not be surprised if we decide in a few months that we need it. > Which reminds me: if you are using pgbouncer, make sure you set > all databases involved to server_side_prepare=false inside > the bucardo.db table. Yeah, that makes sense. Er, that's supported by `add db`, right? I need to write a patch to fix some documentation issues… David _______________________________________________ Bucardo-general mailing list [email protected] https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
